Black Friday discounts!
Why choose just one? Take ALL of them for a ridiculous price.
Onlinecourses55 - Start page
Home
LOGIN
REGISTER
LOGIN
REGISTER
Seeker
Test The problem with benchmark-based objectives
Agenda
QUESTION 1: What is commonly used in the world of goal setting, with the logic of motivating?
Vague objectives
Benchmarks or reference points
Low standards
Unrealistic goals
QUESTION 2: What unexpected consequence has Alia Crum's research revealed when using high benchmarks?
Greater motivation
Demotivation, as the benchmark is perceived as too high or difficult to achieve
Greater self-efficacy
No effect
QUESTION 3: What nocebo effect creates the feeling of not living up to the benchmark?
A sense of achievement
The belief that "it's not enough" diminishes motivation and generates negative physiological impact
Motivation
Trust
QUESTION 4: What negative physiological impact can the "not enough" mentality have?
That the body does not register the benefits of the exercise that is being done
Just a mental impact
An increase in motivation
No impact
QUESTION 5: What is a smarter goal-setting strategy?
Set very high initial goals
Set lower, more achievable initial goals
Ignoring goals
Focus on failure
QUESTION 6: What does achieving a smaller goal generate?
Frustration
A sense of success and self-efficacy, which motivates you to keep going
Discouragement
No change
QUESTION 7: What should the focus be on, instead of an external benchmark?
Only on an arbitrary benchmark
In personal progress and in the celebration of constant effort
In comparison with others
In quick results
QUESTION 8: What does the focus on personal progress and the celebration of constant effort create?
A vicious circle of frustration
A virtuous circle of motivation and success
A stalemate
A general demotivation
Send
This test is only available to students who have purchased the course
INCORRECT QUESTIONS
Previous
Next
Are there any errors or improvements?
Where is the error?
What is the error?
Send
