QUESTION 1: What was the main finding of the Brandeis University study?

That facial attractiveness has no impact on verdicts
That "baby-faced" defendants are always declared innocent
That defendants with mature faces are always found guilty
That differences in the defendants' facial attractiveness had a huge impact on the verdict

QUESTION 2: In cases involving intentional harm (such as assault), what happened to "baby-faced" defendants?

They were only found guilty in 45% of cases, much less than those with mature faces
They were found guilty in 92% of the cases
They were much more likely to be found guilty
The type of face had no influence

Because our reason tells us that they are more prone to violence
Because they are associated with negligence
Because judges are always impartial
Because our intuition tells us that someone who seems cute and innocent cannot be capable of intentional evil