Onlinecourses55 - Start page
Home
LOGIN
REGISTER
LOGIN
REGISTER
Seeker
Test The Complaint Process and Judicial Instance
Agenda
1st QUESTION: Statistically, what does the time of reporting represent in terms of safety?
It is the moment of greatest tranquility
It is a simple administrative procedure
It is the moment of greatest physical danger for the victim
It is irrelevant to the risk
QUESTION 2: Why is it vital to provide a comprehensive chronology of historical abuse in the report?
To bore the judge
To make the complaint longer
Because an isolated incident does not reflect the real risk and the history links the suspect if the violence escalates
Because it is mandatory by law to write 10 pages
QUESTION 3: What systemic failure frequently occurs in the receipt of the report?
Attempted femicide is misclassified as "minor injuries", minimizing risk
The victim is treated too quickly
Too much importance is given to screams
The aggressor is always arrested without evidence
QUESTION 4: What should be explicitly requested in the act of reporting to trigger security?
A court-appointed lawyer
Immediate financial compensation
An apology from the aggressor
A police risk assessment and immediate precautionary measures
QUESTION 5: What is the risk of lack of communication between the criminal and family courts?
That the aggressor has to pay two lawyers
That a family court judge grant visitation with the aggressor while a criminal restraining order is in effect
Duplicate paperwork
The victim gets the building mixed up
6th QUESTION: What is the difference between the objective of the criminal and family courts?
The criminal route seeks divorce and the family route seeks jail
The criminal route regulates visitation and the family route regulates crimes
There is no difference
The criminal route seeks punishment of the crime and the family route regulates civil consequences (divorce, alimony)
7th QUESTION: What does the expert intervention of "connection of the cases" consist of?
Ensuring that family decisions are subordinated to the security ruled in the criminal court
In totally separating the files
Ignoring the criminal jurisdiction
To mediate between the two judges
8th QUESTION: Why does the "legal truth" often differ from the "experiential truth" of the victim?
Because victims always lie
Because psychological terror is difficult to prove without specialized expertise to prove the damage
Because judges do not listen
Because lawyers are expensive
Send
This test is only available to students who have purchased the course
INCORRECT QUESTIONS
Previous
Next
Are there any errors or improvements?
Where is the error?
What is the error?
Send
