LOGIN

REGISTER
Seeker

Erikson's challenge: integrity vs. despair

Select the language:

This video is only available to students who have purchased the course.

Transcription Erikson's challenge: integrity vs. despair


Erik Erikson, psychoanalyst and developmental theorist, left a fundamental legacy with his theory of psychosocial development stages. One of the last stages, the "integrity versus despair," defines the central conflict that individuals face in the last stage of their lives.

In this session, we will explore in detail this stage, analyzing its foundations, its implications in old age, and how it influences the perception of life and death.

Erik Erikson's Contribution to Psychosocial Development

Erik Erikson proposed a life-spanning development theory, in contrast with earlier theories that mainly focused on childhood.

The "integrity versus despair" stage is the eighth and last stage of his model, reflecting the challenges that people face in old age. This text will delve into this stage, unraveling its meaning and examining how people confront the reality of their lives in their last years.

The integrity stage is situated in late old age and focuses on retrospective reflection. Individuals review their lives, evaluating achievements and failures, accepting past events, and ultimately assessing whether they have lived a meaningful life.

This evaluation process is essential for the development of integrity, a sense of wholeness and fulfillment, as opposed to despair that arises from the feeling of missed opportunities and regrets.

Authenticity and Identity Integration

The stage of integrity is directly related to the integration of identity throughout life. Those who have achieved a sense of authenticity and coherence throughout the previous stages are better prepared to face the integrity stage with a feeling of satisfaction and acceptance. The integration of identity is essential to close the development cycle and embrace the end of life with a sense of fulfillment.

In old age, losses become more prominent, whether it's the loss of loved ones, health, or significant roles. Handling these losses is a central aspect of the integrity challenge.

Accepting the reality of finitude and, at the same time, acknowledging achievements and contributions made throughout life are crucial elements. Those who can find meaning even in losses experience a greater sense of integrity.

Despair as an Alternative

Despair, the counterpart of integrity, arises when individuals face the end of their lives with unresolved regrets and a sense of disillusionment.

These feelings may arise from a lack of resolution in earlier development stages or from a negative life evaluation in general. Despair often manifests as deep sorrow and a feeling that life has been in vain.

Social support and interpersonal connections play a critical role in how people face the integrity challenge. Meaningful relationships, whether with friends, family, or communities, offer a space for shared reflection and emotional support.

The ability to share life stories and receive validation can be therapeutic, helping to alleviate the emotional burden of unresolved challenges.

The Role of Spirituality and Transcendence

Spirituality and the search for transcendental meaning are also factors that influence


erikson challenge integrity vs despair

Recent publications by child adolescent psychology

Are there any errors or improvements?

Where is the error?

What is the error?