LOGIN

REGISTER
Seeker

Expectation Misalignment Traps

Select the language:

This video is only available to students who have purchased the course.

Transcription Expectation Misalignment Traps


Expectation misalignment is one of the most common causes of conflict, and it often arises from the way professionals communicate information or, worse, what they choose not to communicate.

These traps consist of allowing the customer to have the wrong idea about a product, service, or process, whether through negligence, fear of an argument, or a false promise.

The bottom line is that by avoiding a minor annoyance in the present, you are guaranteeing that a much bigger and thornier problem will erupt in the future.

Misalignment can happen in a variety of ways.

An expectation mismatch occurs when the customer believes they will receive something (a refund, a feature, 24/7 support) that is not actually included in the service.

A common example is when a customer assumes a promotion applies to all items in a store, when in fact it only applies to certain items.

If the professional does not correct this misconception, the customer will feel cheated at checkout.

Another trap is overlooking details or "fine print" in order to close a deal or interaction.

If a salesperson promises that a service includes a feature that is only in the premium package, the customer service representative is the one who will have to deal with the frustration when the customer realizes the feature is not available.

False promises, made out of optimism or under pressure from an important client, are the most direct form of this trap.

A representative may promise a resolution timeframe that they cannot meet, and when the time comes, the company's credibility suffers.

In all of these cases, the professional is avoiding an uncomfortable discussion in the present, but the problem always returns stronger, because the customer feels betrayed.

The only way to avoid these traps is to prioritize honesty and clarity.

It is preferable to have a small conflict in the moment, correcting a faulty assumption or asking apologies for a miscommunication than letting the problem fester in silence.

Honesty builds long-term trust, even if the conversat


expectation misalignment traps

Recent publications by client conflict resolution

Are there any errors or improvements?

Where is the error?

What is the error?