Transcription Attitudes to Identity Crises: Rejection vs. Reflexivity
The Crossroads of Identity
In the ongoing journey of constructing our identity, particularly when faced with the crises and changes that inevitably arise, we are faced with a fundamental bifurcation that presents at least two alternative attitudes.
How we choose to position ourselves in the face of these moments of transition and uncertainty will decisively influence our experience and the final outcome of the process, determining whether it leads to stagnation or growth.
These two positions represent diametrically opposed approaches to the need for redefinition that accompanies life crises, whether personal or professional.
Being aware of these alternatives allows us to choose more deliberately which path to take to navigate the transformation.
Attitude of Rejection: Clinging to the Past
The first option is to adopt an attitude of rejection. This posture is characterized by an active resistance to change, an attempt to cling tightly to the situation, status or identity that has been maintained up to the present moment.
From this perspective, any alteration of the status quo is interpreted as a direct threat, a potential loss of the level achieved, whether in terms of security, recognition or comfort.
This perception of threat usually generates intense feelings of defense and self-protection.
The person may become rigid, resist new ideas, deny the need to adapt, and even experience profound unhappiness at the prospect of losing the familiar and known.
Although it may seem like a short-term survival strategy, this attitude often leads to immobility, frustration and difficulty adjusting to a reality that inevitably keeps changing.
Attitude of Reflexivity: Embracing Opportunity
The constructive alternative is the attitude of reflexivity. Those who adopt this approach do not see the crisis as a catastrophe, but as an opportunity for conversion and transformation of one's identity.
Change is perceived not as a loss, but as a valuable opportunity for personal and professional growth.
This perspective allows one to renew beliefs that may no longer serve, update knowledge and skills, and redefine one's identity in a way that is more aligned with new circumstances and aspirations.
Instead of focusing on what is left behind, the focus is on what can be gained: increased self-knowledge, strengthened resilience, and a deeper understanding of one's own possibilities and limitations.
This attitude fosters a proactive mindset, seeking the learning inherent in the experience and using the crisis as a catalyst for positive, conscious evolution.
Summary
Faced with identity crises and change, people face a bifurcation with at least two alternative attitudes. The stance chosen in the face of uncertainty will determine whether stagnation or growth occurs.
The rejection attitude is characterized by resistance to change, attempting to cling to the status quo or past identity. This posture sees disruption as a threat and can lead to rigidity and frustration.
The attitude of reflexivity sees crisis as a valuable opportunity for transformation and personal growth. This approach encourages belief renewal, self-awareness and a proactive mindset.
attitudes to identity crises rejection vs reflexivity