Realistic optimism vs. toxic optimism

The ''positive thinking'' trend and the lack of scientific support

Optimism is a valued quality, but we must distinguish between realistic and toxic optimism.

Toxic optimism is based on the idea that it is enough to ''think positively'', ignoring problems.

This trend lacks scientific support and can be dangerous, leading us to inaction.

Definition of realistic optimism: believing that situations can improve, without ignoring problems

Realistic optimism, on the other hand, is much more useful.

A person with realistic optimism does not deny reality; recognizes problems, but maintains the belief that situations can improve and that they can act to make it happen.

Proactive optimism: taking action to make improvement happen

This type of optimism is proactive.

It doesn't remain a wish, but rather drives the person to look for solutions, make plans, and take action.

It accepts obstacles but trusts in their ability to overcome them.

Protection against toxic optimism: knowing it, being proactive, and using "strategic negativism"

To protect ourselves from toxic optimism, we can follow three recommendations: knowing realistic optimism, being proactive, and using "strategic negativism."

The latter means thinking about the worst that could happen, not to be pessimistic, but to be prepared and have alternative plans.

Summary

Toxic optimism encourages positive thinking without considering real problems, lacks scientific support, and can lead to inaction, ignoring important obstacles that require attention.

Realistic optimism recognizes difficulties but maintains hope for improvement, driving the person to face reality with confidence and act to achieve effective solutions.

To avoid toxic optimism, it is key to be proactive, know realistic optimism and apply strategic negativism, which anticipates problems to prepare and have alternative plans without falling into pessimism.