Video CV Analysis (Example Critique).

Introduction: The Objective of the Analysis

This exercise consists of analyzing a "Video CV" of a fictitious candidate named Landy.

The purpose is to listen carefully to her responses to a series of standard interview questions and, more importantly, to identify which aspects of her responses lack depth and would require additional probing for real evidence.

These types of prepared responses, which function as a "sales pitch," are very typical, and analysis teaches us how to break them down.

Analysis of Theoretical and Superficial Responses

A large portion of the candidate's responses are theoretical, abstract or future, and lack past behavioral evidence.

"Describe yourself" question: Candidate responds with an acronym (L-A-N-D-Y) and a metaphor ("a workbook"). The question itself is too broad and hypothetical.

The candidate's answer is clearly pre-prepared and future-based ("I would see myself...").

The interviewer should have probed by asking for specific examples from the past that demonstrate those qualities.

"Passion" question: She answers that she is passionate about "traveling."

While this is a valid answer, the interviewer should probe to connect that passion to the work environment: "How has that learning from travel benefited your performance in a work situation?".

"Strength" question: answer that you are "optimistic" and that everything is solvable. This is a predictable theoretical answer.

Specific examples from the past would be needed that demonstrate how your optimism solved a real problem at work.

"Work Style" question: respond with hyperbole such as "best ever" and "100% commitment."

These are sound bites that need immediate clarification, e.g., "What does '100% commitment' mean to you? Can you give me an example of the last time you demonstrated this?"

"Success" question: go back to giving a good theoretical answer (finding something you like, attitude, hard work).

The interviewer should ask for real examples to see if she operates that way: "What is an example of a success, big or small, that has made you proud?".

Red Flags Analysis and Concerning Responses

Some responses are not only superficial, but raise red flags that should be investigated immediately.

Weakness (Red Flag 1): When asked for her greatest weakness, the candidate responds "being cumbersome" and that this leads her to "make silly mistakes." This is a critical red flag.

Although she tries to present it positively ("I learn a lot", "I create laughter"), this is not an acceptable justification.

The interviewer should probe here, "Can you give me examples of such mistakes?", "What was their impact?" and "How often do they occur?".

Stress (Red Flag 2): You answer that you have never encountered stress or pressure.

This response is not credible (as the reviewer points out, "You're right. I don't believe you"). It is a cop-out.

The interviewer should challenge this with a behavioral question such as, "Tell me about a time when you had to fight hard for a goal and didn't give up."