LOGIN

REGISTER
Seeker

The fundamental attribution error and the actor-observer bias

Select the language:

Please log in to have your progress recorded. Without logging in, you will be able to view the video but your progress in the course will not be increased.

Transcription The fundamental attribution error and the actor-observer bias


Although we seek to explain behavior rationally, we often fall into systematic biases in our attributions.

Two of the most studied and relevant are the fundamental attribution error (or correspondence bias) and the actor-observer bias.

The Fundamental Attribution Error

The fundamental attribution error describes the widespread tendency to overestimate the influence of dispositional (internal, personality) factors and underestimate the influence of situational (external) factors when explaining other people's behavior.

When we see someone act, we tend to assume that their behavior reflects who they are as a person, without sufficiently considering how the situation might be shaping that behavior.

For example, if we see someone stumble, we are more likely to think "he was clumsy" (internal attribution) than "the floor was slippery" (external attribution).

This bias is "fundamental" because it is very common and can lead to erroneous judgments about others.

Actor-Observer Bias

The actor-observer bias is an extension or particular manifestation of the fundamental attribution error that introduces a key difference: we tend to explain other people's behavior in terms of their internal dispositions, but we explain our own behavior in terms of external situational factors, especially when the behavior is negative or has unintended consequences.

As "actors," when we perform an action, we are more aware of the situational forces that influence us.

If we are late for an appointment, we are likely to attribute it to traffic or an unforeseen event (situational).

However, as "observers," if someone else is late, we are more likely to attribute it to their lack of punctuality or disorganization (dispositional).

This difference in perspective (actor vs. observer) is due in partly due to the availability of information.

As actors, we have more information about our own internal states, intentions, and the situational pressures we face.

As observers, the person and their behavior are more salient than the situation.

Implications and Perceptual Salience

Both biases have important implications for interpersonal relationships and mutual understanding. They can lead to misunderstandings, unfair judgments, and conflicts.

One explanation for these biases is "perceptual salience": when we observe others, the person is the figure that stands out against the background of the situation,so we attribute causality to the person.

When we act ourselves, the situation is more salient, since our attention is directed toward the environment to guide our behavior.

Being aware of these biases can help us make more balanced and accurate attributions.


the fundamental attribution error and the actor observer bias

Recent publications by social psychology

Are there any errors or improvements?

Where is the error?

What is the error?