ByOnlinecourses55
Act vs. traditional cbt: why letting go of controlling your thoughts works better - therapy acceptance commitment
When we seek relief from psychological distress, we often come across two ways of working with the mind. One tries to organize, challenge and modify what we think. The other proposes changing the relationship we have with our internal experiences, without needing to fight them. Both aim to reduce suffering and expand the freedom to live according to what matters, but they do so from different premises.
The traditional cognitive approach focuses on identifying automatic thoughts and biases, testing them and replacing them with more accurate interpretations. The alternative based on acceptance and commitment focuses on stopping the struggle with mental content, cultivating presence, differentiating from mental stories and moving forward with actions consistent with one’s values.
Trying not to think about something tends to produce the opposite effect. The more we try to suppress an idea, the more it returns, with greater strength and frequency. That “rebound” is a control trap: we consume energy monitoring that the thought does not appear, and that monitoring keeps it alive on the radar. The result is fatigue, more anxiety and the feeling of losing the internal battle.
Also, measuring success in terms of “negative thoughts not appearing” creates an impossible standard. The mental stream is creative, involuntary and sometimes chaotic. If well‑being depends on the mind being silent or entirely positive, we condemn ourselves to an eternal war.
Acceptance is not resignation nor enduring forever; it is stopping the investment of effort in controlling the uncontrollable (thoughts, memories, emotions) and redirecting it to what is in your hands (responses, choices, steps aligned with your values). It involves allowing what is already happening inside to be, without adding layers of struggle.
Instead of arguing with every mental sentence, you learn to see it as what it is: language activity. Techniques like prefacing “I’m having the thought that…” reduce fusion with the content. When a thought is experienced as sound or text, its power to dictate behavior diminishes.
The practice of mindfulness trains you to notice sensations, breath and the environment in real time. This provides an anchor when the mind drags you to catastrophic futures or ruminated pasts. Being in the body returns options: you can choose your next action without the internal storm sweeping you away.
Values are directions, not goals to be checked off. Choosing “to be a present and loving person” guides small daily behaviors, even if anxiety accompanies you. Progress is measured by steps consistent with what matters, not by how many unpleasant thoughts you managed to eradicate.
Distortions are detected (catastrophizing, mind reading, all‑or‑nothing), alternative hypotheses are formulated and evidence is weighed. The goal is to arrive at more realistic and functional interpretations, reducing the emotional intensity linked to inaccurate judgments.
Besides working with ideas, behavioral tasks are promoted to test beliefs and break cycles of avoidance. By experimenting, the person sees for themselves that certain fears are not confirmed or that they can tolerate them.
This approach is very useful when cognitive biases are clear and behaviors maintain the problem. But when a fierce struggle to eradicate sensations and thoughts appears, the insistence on changing mental content can feed the control trap. There, flexibilizing the relationship with the mind proves more effective.
Sit for a minute. Observe the stream of your mind as if it were a river. Place each thought that appears on an imaginary leaf and let it pass. Don’t push or stop; return to the breath when you notice you’ve climbed onto a leaf. Practice for two or three minutes.
When a harsh judgment arises, say internally or in a low voice: “I’m having the thought that I’m no good.” Notice the bodily difference between “I’m no good” and “I’m having the thought that…”. That micro‑distance is defusion.
Try 5‑4‑3‑2‑1: name five things you see, four you feel with touch, three you hear, two you smell and one you taste. This brings you back to the present when the mind accelerates.
Choose a value for today (care, learning, courage) and define a five‑minute step that expresses it. Even if anxiety appears, do the step. At the end of the day evaluate what that gesture brought you closer to, beyond how you felt.
Imagine quicksand: the more you struggle to get out with frantic movements, the more you sink. The exit is counterintuitive: expand, float, move slowly and use available support. Something similar happens with the mind: stopping the struggle opens options to move carefully toward solid ground.
You don’t need to win every argument with your mind to live well. Changing the relationship with thoughts, allowing internal experience and moving toward what matters is usually more sustainable than fighting to control the uncontrollable. Freedom doesn’t arrive when the mind falls silent, but when its noise stops directing your behavior.
