QUESTION 2: How does the aggressor react when the victim asks for explanations in the face of ambiguous clues?
3rd QUESTION: What is the implicit message of comparisons with ex-partners or celebrities?
QUESTION 4: What is the purpose of leaving "red herrings" or ambiguous clues?
QUESTION 5: How does the offender behave in social situations to triangulate?
6TH QUESTION: What are "micro-violences" in this context?
7TH QUESTION: What does the victim feel when she sees the aggressor's kind treatment of others and contempt for her?
8th QUESTION: Why does the aggressor give the reason to third parties in discussions even though they are not right?
Please, log in to have your progress recorded. Without logging in, you will be able to take the test but your progress in the course will not be increased
