LOGIN

REGISTER
Seeker

The persuasive source: credibility and appeal

Select the language:

This video is only available to students who have purchased the course.

Transcription The persuasive source: credibility and appeal


In the process of persuasion, the characteristics of the source or communicator of the message play a crucial role in its effectiveness.

Two of the most influential attributes of the source are its perceived credibility and its attractiveness.

Source Credibility

Credibility refers to how expert and trustworthy the source is perceived by the audience.

A source with high credibility tends to be more persuasive, especially when the audience is not highly motivated or does not have the ability to analyze the message in depth (peripheral route).

  • Expertise: Refers to the knowledge and competence attributed to the source on the subject in question. We are more likely to be persuaded by someone we consider an expert in the field.
  • Trustworthiness: This relates to the perception that the source is honest, impartial, and has no hidden intentions to manipulate. If we perceive that the source is arguing against their own interests or as having nothing personally to gain, their trustworthiness, and thus their persuasiveness, increases.

Source Appeal

Source attractiveness, which may be physical or based on perceived likeability, familiarity, or similarity to the audience, is also an important factor in persuasion.

Attractive sources are often more persuasive, especially for topics of lesser personal importance or when the audience is using the peripheral route of processing.

We are more inclined to agree with people we like or with whom we identify.

Advertising frequently uses attractive celebrities or models based on this principle.

Interacting with Audience Involvement

The relative importance of source credibility and source attractiveness may depend on the audience's degree of personal involvement with the topic.


the persuasive source credibility and attractiveness

Recent publications by social psychology

Are there any errors or improvements?

Where is the error?

What is the error?