Coexistence Committees and Care Mechanisms

Committee Composition and Neutrality

The heart of internal management is the Coexistence Committee (or equivalent figure according to local legislation).

This body must be bipartite and parity, composed of representatives of the company and of the workers.

Its legitimacy depends entirely on the moral quality and neutrality of its members.

They cannot be "judges" or "policemen", but mediators with emotional intelligence and training in conflict resolution.

It is crucial that members have no history of harassment or conflicts of interest.

If employees perceive the committee as an instrument of management to cover up problems, the mechanism is stillborn and distrust will grow.

The Mediating and Confidential Role

The main function of the committee in the initial stages is mediation. Its objective is to create a space for neutral dialogue where the parties can present their points of view and reach agreements on coexistence.

The aim is not to determine guilt or innocence (that is the responsibility of disciplinary or judicial bodies), but to restore the broken social fabric.

Confidentiality is the golden rule: what is said in committee stays in committee.

Leaking information about an ongoing case not only re-victimizes the complainant, but can also lead to legal sanctions for committee members for breach of confidentiality.

Limitations and Case Referrals

It is important to understand that the committee has limits. It does not have direct sanctioning power (it cannot fire or fine).

Its power lies in recommendation and follow-up. In addition, the committee must know when a case exceeds its competence.

If there is evidence of wrongdoing (such as physical sexual harassment or serious violence), the committee should not attempt to "mediate" (since fundamental rights are non-negotiable), but rather activate the protocols to refer the case to senior management for immediate disciplinary action or to the competent lega